Germanium vs. Tungsten

Two defense-critical metals dominated by Chinese supply, with different histories of Western stockpiling and distinct but strategically vital applications

~84,000 t/yr
Tungsten Production
~$35/kg
Tungsten Price
~80%
China Tungsten Share
US and EU
Both on Critical Lists

Hardest Metal Meets Most Valuable Byproduct

Tungsten holds the distinction of having the highest melting point of any metal at 3,422 degrees Celsius, the highest tensile strength at elevated temperatures, and extreme hardness in its carbide form. These properties make it irreplaceable in cutting tools, military penetrators, and high-temperature industrial applications. Germanium, by contrast, is notable for what it does with light: its ability to transmit infrared radiation makes it the foundation of thermal imaging technology.

Both metals share a critical commonality: China produces approximately 80% of global tungsten and 60% of global germanium, giving it dominant positions in two materials essential to Western defense capabilities. Tungsten is needed for the kinetic energy penetrators that form the primary anti-armor weapon in most NATO armored vehicles; germanium is needed for the thermal sights that allow those vehicles to see and engage targets at night and through smoke.

Tungsten has a much longer history as a recognized strategic material. The United States maintained significant tungsten stockpiles throughout the Cold War, and tungsten was the subject of export controls and strategic concern long before the current critical minerals conversation emerged. Germanium"s strategic profile has risen sharply only in the past decade, driven by the expansion of thermal imaging in military platforms and the 2023 Chinese export controls.

Supply Structure: Primary Mine vs. Byproduct

A fundamental difference between tungsten and germanium is their supply structure. Tungsten is a primary mined metal, extracted from scheelite (calcium tungstate) and wolframite (iron manganese tungstate) ore deposits that are large enough to be mined economically on their own merits. This means tungsten production can, in principle, be increased by developing new mines outside China.

The primary mine structure also means there are Western tungsten mining operations, most notably in Austria (Wolfram Bergbau und Hutten) and historically in Portugal, Korea, and Australia. These operations provide a non-Chinese supply base that, while insufficient to meet Western demand, creates a precedent for supply diversification through mine development.

Germanium"s byproduct nature means it cannot be targeted for new primary mines: there are no economically viable germanium ore deposits waiting to be developed. Any expansion of non-Chinese germanium supply must come from incentivizing zinc smelters to install germanium recovery equipment, which requires both capital investment and sufficient germanium price premiums to justify the cost.

Supply Diversification Pathways

Tungsten can be diversified by developing new primary mines in allied countries. Germanium diversification requires incentivizing germanium recovery at existing zinc smelters, which is a less capital-intensive but slower process. Both pathways are being pursued under Western critical minerals strategies, but tungsten is generally further along in the diversification journey.

Germanium vs. Tungsten Detailed Comparison

Attribute
Germanium
Tungsten
Annual Production~140 tonnes~84,000 tonnes
Price per kg~$7,800~$35 (APT basis)
Supply Risk Score9/108/10
China Production Share~60%~80%
Primary Source TypeByproduct of zincPrimary mined (scheelite, wolframite)
Primary End UseIR optics, fiber opticsCemented carbide cutting tools
Defense ApplicationThermal imaging, opticsKinetic energy penetrators, ammunition
Historical StockpilingRecent (post-2023 urgency)Long history in US, EU
Western ProductionCanada, small amountsAustria, Russia (secondary)
Critical Minerals ListUS, EU, UK, JapanUS, EU, UK

Source: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024, International Tungsten Industry Association

Defense Applications: Penetrators and Optics

Both tungsten and germanium are critical to modern armored warfare, but they serve completely different roles. Tungsten is the material of choice for kinetic energy penetrators, the long rod projectiles fired by tank guns that defeat armor through kinetic impact rather than explosive force. Depleted uranium is also used for this purpose, but tungsten remains the preferred material in many applications due to its non-radioactive nature and similar density.

Germanium enables the thermal sights that allow armored vehicles, helicopters, and infantry to detect targets by their heat signature rather than reflected light. This capability is decisive in night combat and in degraded visual environments (smoke, dust, fog). Without germanium optical elements, modern thermal imaging systems cannot function at the performance levels required by military specifications.

The complementary nature of these defense applications means that both materials need to be secured for Western armed forces to maintain full combat capability. A shortage of either would degrade military readiness in ways that are not easily mitigated by substitution.

Tungsten Applications by Demand Share

Application
Share of Demand
Description
Cemented Carbide~60%Cutting tools, mining bits, wear parts (WC-Co)
High-Speed Steel~10%Metal cutting tools, drills
Mill Products (wire, rod)~15%Light bulb filaments, electrodes, contacts
Defense Applications~8%Kinetic energy penetrators, shaped charges, ballast
Electronics~5%Contacts, heat sinks, electrodes
Other~2%Catalysts, pigments, medical radiation shielding

Source: International Tungsten Industry Association (ITIA) 2024

China Production Share: Tungsten vs. Germanium (%)

Source: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024

Stockpiling and Policy Response

The Western policy response to Chinese dominance in tungsten has a much longer history than for germanium. The US National Defense Stockpile included tungsten throughout the Cold War era, and the material has been a recognized strategic concern since at least World War II when tungsten carbide cutting tools were critical to weapons manufacturing capacity.

Germanium achieved similar strategic recognition more recently. The 2023 Chinese export controls dramatically accelerated Western government thinking about germanium stockpiling. The US Defense Logistics Agency has germanium in its National Defense Stockpile, and the European Union has identified germanium as a strategic raw material requiring stockpile consideration under the Critical Raw Materials Act.

For investors, the stockpiling dynamic is important because government purchase programs create demand that can support prices independent of commercial market conditions. When governments build strategic reserves, they may be willing to pay above-market prices to secure supply, creating a price floor that benefits holders of physical material.

Supply Risk Score: Germanium vs. Tungsten

Source: USGS Critical Minerals 2024

Chinese Export Restriction Precedent

China has imposed export restrictions on tungsten at various points in history, most notably reducing export quotas in the 2000s-2010s period. The 2023 germanium and gallium export controls fit a consistent pattern of China using critical mineral supply as economic leverage. Tungsten"s longer history as a target of Chinese export policy provides a precedent for how germanium restrictions might evolve over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tungsten"s primary market is in industrial cutting tools and cemented carbide, which are B2B industrial markets without the consumer-facing narratives that have driven interest in lithium (EVs) or rare earths (EV motors). Additionally, tungsten"s larger production scale and more distributed (though still China-dominated) supply chain mean it does not carry the same extreme scarcity premium as germanium. The tungsten investment ecosystem is also underdeveloped, with no dedicated futures market, though this is a potential catalyst for future market development.
Depleted uranium (DU) is an effective substitute for tungsten in kinetic energy penetrators and is used by the US military, while NATO allies tend to use tungsten-based penetrators due to the political sensitivities around DU. Tungsten"s extreme hardness in cutting tool applications faces growing competition from ceramic cutting materials, but tungsten carbide retains advantages in many industrial applications. The defense and industrial substitution risks are real but moderate over a 10-year horizon.
Tungsten has more established Western supply chains, primarily through the Austrian Wolfram operation and through tungsten recycling (carbide scrap recycling is well-developed, with estimates suggesting 30-40% of tungsten supply comes from scrap). Germanium has very limited non-Chinese primary supply, though recycling from manufacturing scrap and some mine byproduct recovery in Canada and Russia provides alternatives. Western governments have invested more in tungsten supply diversification historically, though germanium is now receiving urgent attention.
Simultaneous supply disruption of both metals would create severe challenges for Western military procurement. Tungsten shortages would affect ammunition manufacturing and cutting tool availability for defense industrial base production. Germanium shortages would affect thermal imaging systems for new platforms and the ability to maintain or repair existing systems. Military stockpiles provide some buffer but are finite. This scenario, while extreme, is precisely the risk that has motivated current Western critical minerals policy.
Dr. Marcus Holt

Ph.D. Materials Science, MIT

Materials Science Editor at Invest In Germanium